600773 vs 600895: Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd vs Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.
60
CN¥22.47
+6.39%
CN¥37.04
+1.56%
Quick Summary
Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd is 2.7× the market cap of Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than 600895. 600895 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥22.47 | CN¥37.04 |
| Daily Change | 6.39% | 1.56% |
| 1-Year Return | 148.01% | 45.77% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥22.47 | CN¥54.95 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥8.76 | CN¥24.08 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥16.20 | CN¥37.85 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥12.99 | CN¥39.56 |
| Beta | 0.36 | 0.89 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $21.38B | $56.68B |
| Enterprise Value | $22.76B | $79.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $918.68M | $4.18B |
| Shares Outstanding | 951.59M | 1.55B |
| Float | 555.34M | 790.75M |
| Employees | 385 | 190 |
Valuation
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 59.03 |
| Forward P/E | 66.23 | 31.75 |
| Price / Sales | 23.27 | 13.55 |
| Price / Book | 4.68 | 3.53 |
| EV / EBITDA | 100.69 | 33.98 |
Profitability
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -60.16% | 23.58% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -68.96% | 37.90% |
| Return on Equity | -16.39% | 5.12% |
| Return on Assets | -0.76% | 1.34% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.58 | 0.62 |
Growth
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -91.50% | 624.10% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -27.80% | -16.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.20 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 9.07 | 0.55 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 14.05 | 0.23 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 17.99 | 4.67 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6248 | 0.6856 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #28,509 | #25,249 |
Ownership
| Metric | 600773 | 600895 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4984.50% | 5170.60% |
| % Institutions | 231.40% | 343.00% |
Compare 600773 to peers
Compare 600895 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.