StockLists
Sign up for free insights newsletter

600515 vs 600895: Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd vs Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.

60
Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd
600515•SHG
CN¥3.63
+0.00%
China
$41.47B
60
Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd
600895•SHG
CN¥37.04
+1.56%
China
$56.68B

Quick Summary

Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd is 1.4× the market cap of Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd. 600895 trades at a lower P/E than 600515. 600895 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600515600895
Current PriceCN¥3.63CN¥37.04
Daily Change0.00%1.56%
1-Year Return0.00%45.77%
52-Week HighCN¥5.62CN¥54.95
52-Week LowCN¥3.30CN¥24.08
50-Day MACN¥4.01CN¥37.85
200-Day MACN¥4.35CN¥39.56
Beta0.310.89

Size & Revenue

Metric600515600895
Market Cap$41.47B$56.68B
Enterprise Value$55.09B$79.93B
Revenue (TTM)$4.56B$4.18B
Shares Outstanding11.43B1.55B
Float8.86B790.75M
Employees10,611190

Valuation

Metric600515600895
Trailing P/E121.0059.03
Forward P/E13.7031.75
Price / Sales9.1013.55
Price / Book1.763.53
EV / EBITDA63.8833.98

Profitability

Metric600515600895
Profit Margin6.80%23.58%
Operating Margin (TTM)-5.59%37.90%
Return on Equity1.26%5.12%
Return on Assets0.53%1.34%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.030.62

Growth

Metric600515600895
Revenue Growth (YoY)15.30%624.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-61.40%-16.50%

Dividends

Metric600515600895
Dividend Yield0.14%0.55%
Dividend / Share0.010.20

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600515600895
Sortino (Composite)-1.090.55
Sharpe (Composite)-0.840.23
Calmar (Composite)-1.934.67
Hurst Exponent0.68100.6856
Piotroski F-Score2/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#27,729#25,249

Ownership

Metric600515600895
% Insiders4711.60%5170.60%
% Institutions1269.20%343.00%

Compare 600515 to peers

600515 vs 001979600515 vs 600048600515 vs 600895600515 vs 000002600515 vs 600663

Compare 600895 to peers

600895 vs 001979600895 vs 600048600895 vs 000002600895 vs 600515600895 vs 600663
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.