000002 vs 600773: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.

000002•SHE
CN¥3.96
+0.00%
60
CN¥22.47
+6.39%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 2.2× the market cap of Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than 000002.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.96 | CN¥22.47 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 6.39% |
| 1-Year Return | -45.83% | 148.01% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥7.18 | CN¥22.47 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.81 | CN¥8.76 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.50 | CN¥16.20 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.63 | CN¥12.99 |
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.36 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.25B | $21.38B |
| Enterprise Value | $322.91B | $22.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233.43B | $918.68M |
| Shares Outstanding | 9.72B | 951.59M |
| Float | 8.68B | 555.34M |
| Employees | 127,638 | 385 |
Valuation
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 34.72 | 66.23 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.27 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.20 | 23.27 |
| Price / Book | 0.40 | 4.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.44 | 100.69 |
Profitability
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -37.94% | -60.16% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -82.99% | -68.96% |
| Return on Equity | -27.68% | -16.39% |
| Return on Assets | -0.88% | -0.76% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -7.45 | -0.58 |
Growth
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -41.60% | -91.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -23.70% | -27.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.28 | 9.07 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.23 | 14.05 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.35 | 17.99 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5951 | 0.6248 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #28,509 |
Ownership
| Metric | 000002 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3535.40% | 4984.50% |
| % Institutions | 758.10% | 231.40% |
Compare 000002 to peers
Compare 600773 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.