600515 vs 600773: Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd vs Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.
CN¥3.63
+0.00%
60
CN¥22.47
+6.39%
Quick Summary
Hainan HNA Infrastructure Investment Group Co Ltd is 1.9× the market cap of Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than 600515. 600515 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.63 | CN¥22.47 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 6.39% |
| 1-Year Return | 0.00% | 148.01% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥5.62 | CN¥22.47 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.30 | CN¥8.76 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.01 | CN¥16.20 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥4.35 | CN¥12.99 |
| Beta | 0.31 | 0.36 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $41.47B | $21.38B |
| Enterprise Value | $55.09B | $22.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.56B | $918.68M |
| Shares Outstanding | 11.43B | 951.59M |
| Float | 8.86B | 555.34M |
| Employees | 10,611 | 385 |
Valuation
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 121.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 13.70 | 66.23 |
| Price / Sales | 9.10 | 23.27 |
| Price / Book | 1.76 | 4.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 63.88 | 100.69 |
Profitability
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.80% | -60.16% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -5.59% | -68.96% |
| Return on Equity | 1.26% | -16.39% |
| Return on Assets | 0.53% | -0.76% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.03 | -0.58 |
Growth
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.30% | -91.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -61.40% | -27.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.09 | 9.07 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.84 | 14.05 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.93 | 17.99 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6810 | 0.6248 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #27,729 | #28,509 |
Ownership
| Metric | 600515 | 600773 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 4711.60% | 4984.50% |
| % Institutions | 1269.20% | 231.40% |
Compare 600515 to peers
Compare 600773 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.