Sign up for free insights newsletter

600773 vs HKHGF: Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd vs Hongkong Land Holdings Limited

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

CN¥22.47
+6.39%
China
$21.38B
HK
HKHGFUnited States
$8.14
+0.00%
United States
$17.16B

Quick Summary

Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of Hongkong Land Holdings Limited. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than HKHGF. HKHGF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600773HKHGF
Current PriceCN¥22.47$8.14
Daily Change6.39%0.00%
1-Year Return148.01%87.13%
52-Week HighCN¥22.47$8.70
52-Week LowCN¥8.76$3.95
50-Day MACN¥16.20
200-Day MACN¥12.99
Beta0.360.34

Size & Revenue

Metric600773HKHGF
Market Cap$21.38B$17.16B
Enterprise Value$22.76B$20.93B
Revenue (TTM)$918.68M$1.45B
Shares Outstanding951.59M2.15B
Float555.34M975.00M
Employees385

Valuation

Metric600773HKHGF
Trailing P/E0.0013.76
Forward P/E66.2325.74
Price / Sales23.2711.85
Price / Book4.680.56
EV / EBITDA100.6964.49

Profitability

Metric600773HKHGF
Profit Margin-60.16%87.23%
Operating Margin (TTM)-68.96%2.20%
Return on Equity-16.39%4.16%
Return on Assets-0.76%0.49%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.580.58

Growth

Metric600773HKHGF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-91.50%-32.30%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-27.80%

Dividends

Metric600773HKHGF
Dividend Yield0.00%313.00%
Dividend / Share0.000.25

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600773HKHGF
Sortino (Composite)9.073.51
Sharpe (Composite)14.051.93
Calmar (Composite)17.999.45
Hurst Exponent0.62480.4962
Piotroski F-Score4/9
Magic Formula Rank#28,509

Ownership

Metric600773HKHGF
% Insiders4984.50%55.04%
% Institutions231.40%15.84%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.