Sign up for free insights newsletter

600773 vs CRBJF: Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd vs China Resources Land Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

CN¥22.47
+6.39%
China
$21.38B
CR
CRBJFUnited States
$3.80
+0.00%
United States
$28.38B

Quick Summary

China Resources Land Ltd is 1.3× the market cap of Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than CRBJF. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600773CRBJF
Current PriceCN¥22.47$3.80
Daily Change6.39%0.00%
1-Year Return148.01%
52-Week HighCN¥22.47$3.98
52-Week LowCN¥8.76$3.80
50-Day MACN¥16.20
200-Day MACN¥12.99
Beta0.36

Size & Revenue

Metric600773CRBJF
Market Cap$21.38B$28.38B
Enterprise Value$22.76B$374.32B
Revenue (TTM)$918.68M$281.44B
Shares Outstanding951.59M7.13B
Float555.34M2.89B
Employees385

Valuation

Metric600773CRBJF
Trailing P/E0.007.37
Forward P/E66.23
Price / Sales23.270.10
Price / Book4.680.68
EV / EBITDA100.698.09

Profitability

Metric600773CRBJF
Profit Margin-60.16%9.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)-68.96%14.59%
Return on Equity-16.39%8.04%
Return on Assets-0.76%2.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.580.54

Growth

Metric600773CRBJF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-91.50%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-27.80%-11.70%

Dividends

Metric600773CRBJF
Dividend Yield0.00%462.00%
Dividend / Share0.000.18

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600773CRBJF
Sortino (Composite)9.07
Sharpe (Composite)14.05
Calmar (Composite)17.99
Hurst Exponent0.6248
Piotroski F-Score4/9
Magic Formula Rank#28,509

Ownership

Metric600773CRBJF
% Insiders4984.50%59.55%
% Institutions231.40%17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.