Home 600773 vs CHKGF 600773 vs CHKGF: Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd vs CK Asset Holdings Limited Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
Quick Summary Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd and CK Asset Holdings Limited are similar in size. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than CHKGF. CHKGF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600773 CHKGF Current Price CN¥22.47 $6.12 Daily Change 6.39% 0.00% 1-Year Return 148.01% 60.21% 52-Week High CN¥22.47 $6.34 52-Week Low CN¥8.76 $3.68 50-Day MA CN¥16.20 $5.57 200-Day MA CN¥12.99 $4.76 Beta 0.36 0.51
Size & Revenue Metric 600773 CHKGF Market Cap $21.38B $21.40B Enterprise Value $22.76B $23.94B Revenue (TTM) $918.68M $48.91B Shares Outstanding 951.59M 3.50B Float 555.34M 1.89B Employees 385 55,000
Valuation Metric 600773 CHKGF Trailing P/E 0.00 14.50 Forward P/E 66.23 11.38 PEG Ratio — 2.39 Price / Sales 23.27 0.44 Price / Book 4.68 0.41 EV / EBITDA 100.69 10.13
Profitability Metric 600773 CHKGF Profit Margin -60.16% 23.80% Operating Margin (TTM) -68.96% 21.48% Return on Equity -16.39% 2.90% Return on Assets -0.76% 1.21% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.58 0.42
Growth Metric 600773 CHKGF Revenue Growth (YoY) -91.50% 15.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -27.80% -26.10%
Dividends Metric 600773 CHKGF Dividend Yield 0.00% 28.57% Dividend / Share 0.00 1.74
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600773 CHKGF Sortino (Composite) 9.07 4.14 Sharpe (Composite) 14.05 4.31 Calmar (Composite) 17.99 9.83 Hurst Exponent 0.6248 0.3401 Piotroski F-Score 4/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank #28,509 #14,033
Ownership Metric 600773 CHKGF % Insiders 4984.50% 4890.20% % Institutions 231.40% 1947.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.