Sign up for free insights newsletter

0083 vs 600773: Sino Land vs Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

Sino Land
0083Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$11.76
-1.51%
Hong Kong
$113.62B
CN¥22.47
+6.39%
China
$21.38B

Quick Summary

Sino Land is 5.3× the market cap of Tibet Urban Development and Investment Co Ltd. 600773 trades at a lower P/E than 0083. 0083 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric0083600773
Current PriceHK$11.76CN¥22.47
Daily Change-1.51%6.39%
1-Year Return54.13%148.01%
52-Week HighHK$13.26CN¥22.47
52-Week LowHK$7.78CN¥8.76
50-Day MAHK$11.98CN¥16.20
200-Day MAHK$10.53CN¥12.99
Beta0.550.36

Size & Revenue

Metric0083600773
Market Cap$113.62B$21.38B
Enterprise Value$61.93B$22.76B
Revenue (TTM)$9.51B$918.68M
Shares Outstanding9.48B951.59M
Float3.69B555.34M
Employees9,700385

Valuation

Metric0083600773
Trailing P/E29.220.00
Forward P/E12.6766.23
PEG Ratio0.34
Price / Sales11.9423.27
Price / Book0.654.68
EV / EBITDA14.42100.69

Profitability

Metric0083600773
Profit Margin39.23%-60.16%
Operating Margin (TTM)31.07%-68.96%
Return on Equity2.19%-16.39%
Return on Assets1.08%-0.76%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.24-0.58

Growth

Metric0083600773
Revenue Growth (YoY)34.50%-91.50%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-20.30%-27.80%

Dividends

Metric0083600773
Dividend Yield4.91%0.00%
Dividend / Share0.580.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric0083600773
Sortino (Composite)2.249.07
Sharpe (Composite)1.4714.05
Calmar (Composite)5.1417.99
Hurst Exponent0.58800.6248
Piotroski F-Score5/94/9
Magic Formula Rank#21,805#28,509

Ownership

Metric0083600773
% Insiders6098.00%4984.50%
% Institutions995.60%231.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.