Sign up for free insights newsletter

601868 vs STBBF: China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd vs Strabag SE

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥2.91
+1.04%
China
$120.90B
ST
STBBFUnited States
$105.50
+0.00%
United States
$13.18B

Quick Summary

China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd is 9.2× the market cap of Strabag SE. STBBF trades at a lower P/E than 601868. STBBF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601868STBBF
Current PriceCN¥2.91$105.50
Daily Change1.04%0.00%
1-Year Return28.19%43.73%
52-Week HighCN¥3.74$111.23
52-Week LowCN¥2.20$73.40
50-Day MACN¥2.83$102.86
200-Day MACN¥2.54$94.54
Beta0.540.38

Size & Revenue

Metric601868STBBF
Market Cap$120.90B$13.18B
Enterprise Value$314.63B$8.64B
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$17.92B
Shares Outstanding32.43B115.44M
Float19.53B21.24M
Employees116,05579,159

Valuation

Metric601868STBBF
Trailing P/E15.2613.15
Forward P/E0.000.00
Price / Sales0.270.74
Price / Book1.012.32
EV / EBITDA13.324.07

Profitability

Metric601868STBBF
Profit Margin1.29%4.61%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%-1.66%
Return on Equity4.70%18.39%
Return on Assets1.37%3.17%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.198.46

Growth

Metric601868STBBF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%-2.20%

Dividends

Metric601868STBBF
Dividend Yield1.08%2.25%
Dividend / Share0.032.50

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601868STBBF
Sortino (Composite)1.821.75
Sharpe (Composite)0.871.60
Calmar (Composite)6.122.82
Hurst Exponent0.59380.5181
Piotroski F-Score5/98/9
Magic Formula Rank#18,575#9,795

Ownership

Metric601868STBBF
% Insiders5310.50%6606.00%
% Institutions1099.30%2042.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.