Sign up for free insights newsletter

300750 vs 601868: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A vs China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥444.20
-2.15%
China
$2.02T
CN¥2.91
+1.04%
China
$120.90B

Quick Summary

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A is 16.7× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd. 601868 trades at a lower P/E than 300750. 601868 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric300750601868
Current PriceCN¥444.20CN¥2.91
Daily Change-2.15%1.04%
1-Year Return97.02%28.19%
52-Week HighCN¥453.98CN¥3.74
52-Week LowCN¥230.69CN¥2.20
50-Day MACN¥384.16CN¥2.83
200-Day MACN¥356.38CN¥2.54
Beta0.480.54

Size & Revenue

Metric300750601868
Market Cap$2.02T$120.90B
Enterprise Value$1.81T$314.63B
Revenue (TTM)$468.13B$452.93B
Shares Outstanding4.41B32.43B
Float2.44B19.53B
Employees185,839116,055

Valuation

Metric300750601868
Trailing P/E25.2115.26
Forward P/E23.870.00
PEG Ratio1.97
Price / Sales4.310.27
Price / Book5.801.01
EV / EBITDA17.8613.32

Profitability

Metric300750601868
Profit Margin16.87%1.29%
Operating Margin (TTM)19.45%5.42%
Return on Equity25.36%4.70%
Return on Assets5.40%1.37%
Diluted EPS (TTM)17.520.19

Growth

Metric300750601868
Revenue Growth (YoY)52.40%-8.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)44.00%-47.60%

Dividends

Metric300750601868
Dividend Yield0.00%1.08%
Dividend / Share0.000.03

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric300750601868
Sortino (Composite)7.261.82
Sharpe (Composite)3.270.87
Calmar (Composite)8.856.12
Hurst Exponent0.64340.5938
Piotroski F-Score6/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#11,459#18,575

Ownership

Metric300750601868
% Insiders3820.10%5310.50%
% Institutions2728.20%1099.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.