Home 601298 vs MIHDF 601298 vs MIHDF: Qingdao Port International Co Ltd vs MISC Berhad Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Qingdao Port International Co Ltd is 8.9× the market cap of MISC Berhad. 601298 trades at a lower P/E than MIHDF. 601298 pays a dividend; MIHDF does not.
Price & Performance Metric 601298 MIHDF Current Price CN¥8.89 — Daily Change 0.23% — 1-Year Return 0.34% — 52-Week High CN¥9.79 — 52-Week Low CN¥8.28 — 50-Day MA CN¥9.02 — 200-Day MA CN¥8.75 — Beta 0.49 0.03
Size & Revenue Metric 601298 MIHDF Market Cap $57.77B $6.47B Enterprise Value $44.35B $15.24B Revenue (TTM) $18.81B $11.15B Shares Outstanding 5.39B 4.46B Float 1.37B 2.00B Employees 9,552 —
Valuation Metric 601298 MIHDF Trailing P/E 10.99 14.50 Forward P/E 0.00 — Price / Sales 3.07 0.58 Price / Book 1.26 0.77 EV / EBITDA 6.11 3.17
Profitability Metric 601298 MIHDF Profit Margin 28.03% 15.25% Operating Margin (TTM) 24.63% 25.96% Return on Equity 11.81% 4.76% Return on Assets 5.19% 3.06% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.81 0.10
Growth Metric 601298 MIHDF Revenue Growth (YoY) -7.90% -15.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) -15.30% —
Dividends Metric 601298 MIHDF Dividend Yield 3.89% — Dividend / Share 0.34 —
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601298 MIHDF Sortino (Composite) 0.87 — Sharpe (Composite) 3.75 — Calmar (Composite) 1.11 — Hurst Exponent 0.5849 — Piotroski F-Score 6/9 — Magic Formula Rank #7,073 —
Ownership Metric 601298 MIHDF % Insiders 8860.60% 54.46% % Institutions 247.10% 37.67%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.