Home 300274 vs 601298 300274 vs 601298: Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd vs Qingdao Port International Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 4.7× the market cap of Qingdao Port International Co Ltd. 601298 trades at a lower P/E than 300274. 601298 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 300274 601298 Current Price CN¥132.75 CN¥8.89 Daily Change -0.86% 0.23% 1-Year Return 136.76% 0.34% 52-Week High CN¥205.40 CN¥9.79 52-Week Low CN¥56.24 CN¥8.28 50-Day MA CN¥150.76 CN¥9.02 200-Day MA CN¥145.43 CN¥8.75 Beta 0.47 0.49
Size & Revenue Metric 300274 601298 Market Cap $274.35B $57.77B Enterprise Value $250.14B $44.35B Revenue (TTM) $89.18B $18.81B Shares Outstanding 2.07B 5.39B Float 1.36B 1.37B Employees 19,006 9,552
Valuation Metric 300274 601298 Trailing P/E 20.26 10.99 Forward P/E 20.79 0.00 PEG Ratio 5.78 — Price / Sales 3.08 3.07 Price / Book 5.96 1.26 EV / EBITDA 14.08 6.11
Profitability Metric 300274 601298 Profit Margin 15.09% 28.03% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.85% 24.63% Return on Equity 30.08% 11.81% Return on Assets 8.44% 5.19% Diluted EPS (TTM) 6.53 0.81
Growth Metric 300274 601298 Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.40% -7.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) -52.70% -15.30%
Dividends Metric 300274 601298 Dividend Yield 1.22% 3.89% Dividend / Share 1.64 0.34
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300274 601298 Sortino (Composite) 0.62 0.87 Sharpe (Composite) 0.21 3.75 Calmar (Composite) -0.46 1.11 Hurst Exponent 0.6306 0.5849 Piotroski F-Score 9/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #6,655 #7,073
Ownership Metric 300274 601298 % Insiders 3224.10% 8860.60% % Institutions 1824.70% 247.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.