Home 600150 vs 601298 600150 vs 601298: China CSSC Holdings Ltd vs Qingdao Port International Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary China CSSC Holdings Ltd is 4.3× the market cap of Qingdao Port International Co Ltd. 601298 trades at a lower P/E than 600150. 601298 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600150 601298 Current Price CN¥33.03 CN¥8.89 Daily Change 0.95% 0.23% 1-Year Return 14.01% 0.34% 52-Week High CN¥39.46 CN¥9.79 52-Week Low CN¥28.80 CN¥8.28 50-Day MA CN¥34.59 CN¥9.02 200-Day MA CN¥35.17 CN¥8.75 Beta 0.76 0.49
Size & Revenue Metric 600150 601298 Market Cap $248.57B $57.77B Enterprise Value $141.14B $44.35B Revenue (TTM) $94.94B $18.81B Shares Outstanding 7.53B 5.39B Float 3.85B 1.37B Employees 14,986 9,552
Valuation Metric 600150 601298 Trailing P/E 24.65 10.99 Forward P/E 94.34 0.00 Price / Sales 2.62 3.07 Price / Book 1.74 1.26 EV / EBITDA 15.57 6.11
Profitability Metric 600150 601298 Profit Margin 7.11% 28.03% Operating Margin (TTM) 4.51% 24.63% Return on Equity 8.38% 11.81% Return on Assets 1.21% 5.19% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.34 0.81
Growth Metric 600150 601298 Revenue Growth (YoY) 21.90% -7.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) 123.00% -15.30%
Dividends Metric 600150 601298 Dividend Yield 0.76% 3.89% Dividend / Share 0.25 0.34
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600150 601298 Sortino (Composite) 0.66 0.87 Sharpe (Composite) 0.26 3.75 Calmar (Composite) -0.27 1.11 Hurst Exponent 0.5442 0.5849 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #20,669 #7,073
Ownership Metric 600150 601298 % Insiders 4856.30% 8860.60% % Institutions 1069.10% 247.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.