Sign up for free insights newsletter

600649 vs 600895: Shanghai SMI Holding Co Ltd vs Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥4.42
+0.68%
China
$11.07B

Quick Summary

Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd is 5.1× the market cap of Shanghai SMI Holding Co Ltd. 600649 trades at a lower P/E than 600895. 600649 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600649600895
Current PriceCN¥4.42CN¥37.04
Daily Change0.68%1.56%
1-Year Return-9.05%45.77%
52-Week HighCN¥5.64CN¥54.95
52-Week LowCN¥4.18CN¥24.08
50-Day MACN¥4.81CN¥37.85
200-Day MACN¥4.69CN¥39.56
Beta0.860.89

Size & Revenue

Metric600649600895
Market Cap$11.07B$56.68B
Enterprise Value$44.73B$79.93B
Revenue (TTM)$14.46B$4.18B
Shares Outstanding2.50B1.55B
Float1.17B790.75M
Employees491190

Valuation

Metric600649600895
Trailing P/E36.8359.03
Forward P/E0.0031.75
Price / Sales0.7713.55
Price / Book0.523.53
EV / EBITDA24.0233.98

Profitability

Metric600649600895
Profit Margin2.00%23.58%
Operating Margin (TTM)6.15%37.90%
Return on Equity1.12%5.12%
Return on Assets0.98%1.34%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.120.62

Growth

Metric600649600895
Revenue Growth (YoY)-42.00%624.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-99.40%-16.50%

Dividends

Metric600649600895
Dividend Yield0.91%0.55%
Dividend / Share0.040.20

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600649600895
Sortino (Composite)1.500.55
Sharpe (Composite)0.560.23
Calmar (Composite)-0.904.67
Hurst Exponent0.53370.6856
Piotroski F-Score6/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#23,606#25,249

Ownership

Metric600649600895
% Insiders5332.30%5170.60%
% Institutions530.70%343.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.