StockLists
Sign up for free insights newsletter

600266 vs 600895: Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd vs Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.

60
Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd
600266•SHG
CN¥5.11
+0.59%
China
$10.61B
60
Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd
600895•SHG
CN¥37.04
+1.56%
China
$56.68B

Quick Summary

Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development Co Ltd is 5.3× the market cap of Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co Ltd. 600266 trades at a lower P/E than 600895. 600266 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600266600895
Current PriceCN¥5.11CN¥37.04
Daily Change0.59%1.56%
1-Year Return1.19%45.77%
52-Week HighCN¥7.15CN¥54.95
52-Week LowCN¥4.26CN¥24.08
50-Day MACN¥5.33CN¥37.85
200-Day MACN¥5.19CN¥39.56
Beta1.150.89

Size & Revenue

Metric600266600895
Market Cap$10.61B$56.68B
Enterprise Value$32.20B$79.93B
Revenue (TTM)$32.99B$4.18B
Shares Outstanding2.08B1.55B
Float1.13B790.75M
Employees875190

Valuation

Metric600266600895
Trailing P/E0.0059.03
Forward P/E4.8431.75
Price / Sales0.3213.55
Price / Book0.463.53
EV / EBITDA301.2233.98

Profitability

Metric600266600895
Profit Margin-2.22%23.58%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.38%37.90%
Return on Equity-5.28%5.12%
Return on Assets0.24%1.34%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.450.62

Growth

Metric600266600895
Revenue Growth (YoY)25.00%624.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-53.50%-16.50%

Dividends

Metric600266600895
Dividend Yield0.98%0.55%
Dividend / Share0.050.20

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600266600895
Sortino (Composite)-0.340.55
Sharpe (Composite)-0.260.23
Calmar (Composite)-0.614.67
Hurst Exponent0.64120.6856
Piotroski F-Score4/95/9
Magic Formula Rank—#25,249

Ownership

Metric600266600895
% Insiders4830.90%5170.60%
% Institutions915.10%343.00%

Compare 600266 to peers

600266 vs 001979600266 vs 600048600266 vs 600895600266 vs 000002600266 vs 600515

Compare 600895 to peers

600895 vs 001979600895 vs 600048600895 vs 000002600895 vs 600515600895 vs 600663
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.