Sign up for free insights newsletter

600018 vs 601298: Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd vs Qingdao Port International Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥4.93
-1.00%
China
$115.00B
CN¥8.89
+0.23%
China
$57.77B

Quick Summary

Shanghai International Port Group Co Ltd is 2.0× the market cap of Qingdao Port International Co Ltd. 600018 trades at a lower P/E than 601298. 600018 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600018601298
Current PriceCN¥4.93CN¥8.89
Daily Change-1.00%0.23%
1-Year Return-10.69%0.34%
52-Week HighCN¥5.90CN¥9.79
52-Week LowCN¥4.93CN¥8.28
50-Day MACN¥5.07CN¥9.02
200-Day MACN¥5.43CN¥8.75
Beta0.120.49

Size & Revenue

Metric600018601298
Market Cap$115.00B$57.77B
Enterprise Value$132.42B$44.35B
Revenue (TTM)$39.61B$18.81B
Shares Outstanding23.28B5.39B
Float2.82B1.37B
Employees13,0169,552

Valuation

Metric600018601298
Trailing P/E8.5210.99
Forward P/E11.340.00
Price / Sales2.903.07
Price / Book0.821.26
EV / EBITDA5.536.11

Profitability

Metric600018601298
Profit Margin34.24%28.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)14.77%24.63%
Return on Equity9.86%11.81%
Return on Assets2.99%5.19%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.580.81

Growth

Metric600018601298
Revenue Growth (YoY)6.30%-7.90%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-27.10%-15.30%

Dividends

Metric600018601298
Dividend Yield3.92%3.89%
Dividend / Share0.200.34

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600018601298
Sortino (Composite)-1.900.87
Sharpe (Composite)-1.563.75
Calmar (Composite)-4.501.11
Hurst Exponent0.57290.5849
Piotroski F-Score4/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#14,684#7,073

Ownership

Metric600018601298
% Insiders8776.40%8860.60%
% Institutions463.80%247.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.