Sign up for free insights newsletter

300449 vs 601816: Beijing Hanbang Technology Corp vs Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥7.10
-0.98%
China
$2.75B
CN¥4.93
+0.00%
China
$240.71B

Quick Summary

Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd is 87.5× the market cap of Beijing Hanbang Technology Corp. 601816 pays a dividend; 300449 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric300449601816
Current PriceCN¥7.10CN¥4.93
Daily Change-0.98%0.00%
1-Year Return0.42%-17.42%
52-Week HighCN¥9.18CN¥6.02
52-Week LowCN¥6.62CN¥4.84
50-Day MACN¥5.00
200-Day MACN¥5.17
Beta0.490.22

Size & Revenue

Metric300449601816
Market Cap$2.75B$240.71B
Enterprise Value$2.76B$278.84B
Revenue (TTM)$181.60M$42.61B
Shares Outstanding386.04M48.93B
Float285.32M14.08B
Employees86

Valuation

Metric300449601816
Trailing P/E18.22
Forward P/E9.900.00
Price / Sales15.165.65
Price / Book8.871.18
EV / EBITDA-51.5914.55

Profitability

Metric300449601816
Profit Margin-49.79%30.64%
Operating Margin (TTM)-84.64%48.10%
Return on Equity-25.62%5.80%
Return on Assets-6.71%4.17%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.230.27

Growth

Metric300449601816
Revenue Growth (YoY)21.40%2.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)9.40%

Dividends

Metric300449601816
Dividend Yield3.18%
Dividend / Share0.16

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric300449601816
Sortino (Composite)-0.50-1.07
Sharpe (Composite)-0.32-0.83
Calmar (Composite)-1.53-1.74
Hurst Exponent0.62210.4423
Piotroski F-Score9/9
Magic Formula Rank#15,977

Ownership

Metric300449601816
% Insiders35.85%6497.20%
% Institutions0.79%2138.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.