Home 300274 vs 300449 300274 vs 300449: Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd vs Beijing Hanbang Technology Corp Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 99.7× the market cap of Beijing Hanbang Technology Corp. 300274 pays a dividend; 300449 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 300274 300449 Current Price CN¥132.75 CN¥7.10 Daily Change -0.86% -0.98% 1-Year Return 136.76% 0.42% 52-Week High CN¥205.40 CN¥9.18 52-Week Low CN¥56.24 CN¥6.62 50-Day MA CN¥150.76 — 200-Day MA CN¥145.43 — Beta 0.47 0.49
Size & Revenue Metric 300274 300449 Market Cap $274.35B $2.75B Enterprise Value $250.14B $2.76B Revenue (TTM) $89.18B $181.60M Shares Outstanding 2.07B 386.04M Float 1.36B 285.32M Employees 19,006 —
Valuation Metric 300274 300449 Trailing P/E 20.26 — Forward P/E 20.79 9.90 PEG Ratio 5.78 — Price / Sales 3.08 15.16 Price / Book 5.96 8.87 EV / EBITDA 14.08 -51.59
Profitability Metric 300274 300449 Profit Margin 15.09% -49.79% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.85% -84.64% Return on Equity 30.08% -25.62% Return on Assets 8.44% -6.71% Diluted EPS (TTM) 6.53 -0.23
Growth Metric 300274 300449 Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.40% 21.40% Earnings Growth (YoY) -52.70% —
Dividends Metric 300274 300449 Dividend Yield 1.22% — Dividend / Share 1.64 —
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300274 300449 Sortino (Composite) 0.62 -0.50 Sharpe (Composite) 0.21 -0.32 Calmar (Composite) -0.46 -1.53 Hurst Exponent 0.6306 0.6221 Piotroski F-Score 9/9 — Magic Formula Rank #6,655 —
Ownership Metric 300274 300449 % Insiders 3224.10% 35.85% % Institutions 1824.70% 0.79%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.