1918 vs ASPL: Sunac China Holdings Limited vs Aseana Properties Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
19
1918•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.09
+2.83%
AS
ASPL•London Stock Exchange
$0.07
+0.00%
$2.17B
Quick Summary
Sunac China Holdings Limited is 7.9× the market cap of Aseana Properties Limited. ASPL trades at a lower P/E than 1918.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$1.09 | $0.07 |
| Daily Change | 2.83% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -31.01% | -15.15% |
| 52-Week High | HK$1.87 | $0.09 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$0.99 | $0.07 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$1.15 | $0.07 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$1.38 | $0.08 |
| Beta | 0.29 | 0.48 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $17.24B | $2.17B |
| Enterprise Value | $226.46B | $30.31M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45.12B | $13.58M |
| Shares Outstanding | 16.12B | 289.65M |
| Float | 9.08B | 72.00M |
| Employees | 31,365 | 242 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 1.14 | 0.00 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.43 | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | 0.38 | 1.60 |
| Price / Book | 0.43 | 0.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 81.88 | 0.00 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -27.33% | -21.02% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -12.93% | -37.68% |
| Return on Equity | -26.88% | -6.19% |
| Return on Assets | -0.72% | -4.77% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -2.48 | -0.02 |
Growth
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -36.80% | 159.90% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 8.40% | 0.00% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.04 | -1.16 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.64 | -1.05 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.51 | -1.49 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4675 | 0.5432 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | 6/9 |
Ownership
| Metric | 1918 | ASPL |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2593.40% | 6161.90% |
| % Institutions | 1063.20% | 2090.90% |
Compare 1918 to peers
Compare ASPL to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.