1109 vs 1918: China Resources Land Ltd vs Sunac China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in Hong Kong.

1109•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$31.34
+0.32%
19
1918•Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.09
+2.83%
Quick Summary
China Resources Land Ltd is 12.8× the market cap of Sunac China Holdings Limited. 1918 trades at a lower P/E than 1109. 1109 pays a dividend; 1918 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | HK$31.34 | HK$1.09 |
| Daily Change | 0.32% | 2.83% |
| 1-Year Return | 14.59% | -31.01% |
| 52-Week High | HK$33.10 | HK$1.87 |
| 52-Week Low | HK$24.95 | HK$0.99 |
| 50-Day MA | HK$30.36 | HK$1.15 |
| 200-Day MA | HK$29.81 | HK$1.38 |
| Beta | 0.63 | 0.29 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $220.35B | $17.24B |
| Enterprise Value | $411.79B | $226.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $281.44B | $45.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | 7.13B | 16.12B |
| Float | 2.88B | 9.08B |
| Employees | 59,077 | 31,365 |
Valuation
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 7.57 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 6.07 | 1.14 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.66 | 0.43 |
| Price / Sales | 0.78 | 0.38 |
| Price / Book | 0.66 | 0.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.38 | 81.88 |
Profitability
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 9.03% | -27.33% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.59% | -12.93% |
| Return on Equity | 8.04% | -26.88% |
| Return on Assets | 2.56% | -0.72% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 3.82 | -2.48 |
Growth
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.60% | -36.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -11.70% | 8.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.77% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.17 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.14 | -1.04 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 4.96 | 1.64 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 4.71 | -1.51 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5430 | 0.4675 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | 4/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #13,989 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 1109 | 1918 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5955.30% | 2593.40% |
| % Institutions | 1745.90% | 1063.20% |
Compare 1109 to peers
Compare 1918 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.