Sign up for free insights newsletter

002672 vs 601919: Dongjiang Environmental Co Ltd vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥4.18
-3.46%
China
$5.39B
CN¥14.72
-1.34%
China
$225.40B

Quick Summary

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 41.8× the market cap of Dongjiang Environmental Co Ltd. 601919 pays a dividend; 002672 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric002672601919
Current PriceCN¥4.18CN¥14.72
Daily Change-3.46%-1.34%
1-Year Return8.85%3.52%
52-Week HighCN¥5.51CN¥16.97
52-Week LowCN¥3.89CN¥14.15
50-Day MACN¥15.17
200-Day MACN¥15.09
Beta0.74

Size & Revenue

Metric002672601919
Market Cap$5.39B$225.40B
Enterprise Value$8.49B$148.41B
Revenue (TTM)$3.46B$219.50B
Shares Outstanding905.12M12.56B
Float603.12M7.15B
Employees32,768

Valuation

Metric002672601919
Trailing P/E7.43
Forward P/E11.628.52
PEG Ratio0.26
Price / Sales1.561.03
Price / Book2.270.98
EV / EBITDA418.463.30

Profitability

Metric002672601919
Profit Margin-35.62%14.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)-20.77%7.82%
Return on Equity-38.54%12.39%
Return on Assets-3.67%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.751.98

Growth

Metric002672601919
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.70%-12.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-64.60%

Dividends

Metric002672601919
Dividend Yield6.70%
Dividend / Share1.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric002672601919
Sortino (Composite)-0.75-0.69
Sharpe (Composite)-0.60-0.76
Calmar (Composite)-2.34-2.67
Hurst Exponent0.54250.6273
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,776

Ownership

Metric002672601919
% Insiders57.03%6106.30%
% Institutions0.52%829.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.