Home 002672 vs 300274 002672 vs 300274: Dongjiang Environmental Co Ltd vs Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 50.9× the market cap of Dongjiang Environmental Co Ltd. 300274 pays a dividend; 002672 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 002672 300274 Current Price CN¥4.18 CN¥132.75 Daily Change -3.46% -0.86% 1-Year Return 8.85% 136.76% 52-Week High CN¥5.51 CN¥205.40 52-Week Low CN¥3.89 CN¥56.24 50-Day MA — CN¥150.76 200-Day MA — CN¥145.43 Beta — 0.47
Size & Revenue Metric 002672 300274 Market Cap $5.39B $274.35B Enterprise Value $8.49B $250.14B Revenue (TTM) $3.46B $89.18B Shares Outstanding 905.12M 2.07B Float 603.12M 1.36B Employees — 19,006
Valuation Metric 002672 300274 Trailing P/E — 20.26 Forward P/E 11.62 20.79 PEG Ratio — 5.78 Price / Sales 1.56 3.08 Price / Book 2.27 5.96 EV / EBITDA 418.46 14.08
Profitability Metric 002672 300274 Profit Margin -35.62% 15.09% Operating Margin (TTM) -20.77% 3.85% Return on Equity -38.54% 30.08% Return on Assets -3.67% 8.44% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.75 6.53
Growth Metric 002672 300274 Revenue Growth (YoY) 3.70% -18.40% Earnings Growth (YoY) — -52.70%
Dividends Metric 002672 300274 Dividend Yield — 1.22% Dividend / Share — 1.64
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002672 300274 Sortino (Composite) -0.75 0.62 Sharpe (Composite) -0.60 0.21 Calmar (Composite) -2.34 -0.46 Hurst Exponent 0.5425 0.6306 Piotroski F-Score — 9/9 Magic Formula Rank — #6,655
Ownership Metric 002672 300274 % Insiders 57.03% 3224.10% % Institutions 0.52% 1824.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.