Home 002672 vs 300779 002672 vs 300779: Dongjiang Environmental Co Ltd vs Qingdao Huicheng Environmental Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Qingdao Huicheng Environmental Co Ltd is 3.5× the market cap of Dongjiang Environmental Co Ltd. 300779 pays a dividend; 002672 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 002672 300779 Current Price CN¥4.18 CN¥90.50 Daily Change -3.46% -0.12% 1-Year Return 8.85% -34.88% 52-Week High CN¥5.51 CN¥245.02 52-Week Low CN¥3.89 CN¥84.40 50-Day MA — CN¥96.37 200-Day MA — CN¥145.51 Beta — 0.63
Size & Revenue Metric 002672 300779 Market Cap $5.39B $19.10B Enterprise Value $8.49B $21.98B Revenue (TTM) $3.46B $1.16B Shares Outstanding 905.12M 211.35M Float 603.12M 139.11M Employees — 1,177
Valuation Metric 002672 300779 Trailing P/E — 361.52 Forward P/E 11.62 0.00 Price / Sales 1.56 16.44 Price / Book 2.27 14.26 EV / EBITDA 418.46 205.72
Profitability Metric 002672 300779 Profit Margin -35.62% 2.31% Operating Margin (TTM) -20.77% 12.33% Return on Equity -38.54% 1.60% Return on Assets -3.67% 1.04% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.75 0.25
Growth Metric 002672 300779 Revenue Growth (YoY) 3.70% 16.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) — 151.10%
Dividends Metric 002672 300779 Dividend Yield — 0.11% Dividend / Share — 0.10
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 002672 300779 Sortino (Composite) -0.75 -1.01 Sharpe (Composite) -0.60 -0.74 Calmar (Composite) -2.34 -1.91 Hurst Exponent 0.5425 0.5443 Piotroski F-Score — 3/9 Magic Formula Rank — #28,650
Ownership Metric 002672 300779 % Insiders 57.03% 4278.40% % Institutions 0.52% 240.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.