000002 vs 000402: China Vanke Co Ltd Class A vs Financial Street Holdings Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in China.
000002•SHE
CN¥3.96
+0.00%
00
000402•SHE
CN¥2.81
-1.06%
Quick Summary
China Vanke Co Ltd Class A is 5.6× the market cap of Financial Street Holdings Co Ltd. 000402 trades at a lower P/E than 000002.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥3.96 | CN¥2.81 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -1.06% |
| 1-Year Return | -45.83% | -7.57% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥7.18 | CN¥3.35 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.81 | CN¥2.46 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.50 | CN¥2.74 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.63 | CN¥2.91 |
| Beta | 0.85 | 0.98 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $47.25B | $8.40B |
| Enterprise Value | $322.91B | $65.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $233.43B | $13.67B |
| Shares Outstanding | 9.72B | 2.99B |
| Float | 8.68B | 2.06B |
| Employees | 127,638 | 1,933 |
Valuation
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 34.72 | 6.85 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.27 | 0.76 |
| Price / Sales | 0.20 | 0.61 |
| Price / Book | 0.40 | 0.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.44 | 16.67 |
Profitability
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -37.94% | -71.80% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -82.99% | 2.97% |
| Return on Equity | -27.68% | -32.96% |
| Return on Assets | -0.88% | -2.89% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -7.45 | -3.29 |
Growth
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -41.60% | -19.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -23.70% | -52.90% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.18 | 0.69 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.12 | 0.15 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.51 | 2.48 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5951 | 0.4285 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | 5/9 |
Ownership
| Metric | 000002 | 000402 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3535.40% | 3429.70% |
| % Institutions | 758.10% | 2178.50% |
Compare 000002 to peers
Compare 000402 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.