Home GFL vs TRI GFL vs TRI: Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc vs Thomson Reuters Corp Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in Canada.
GFL • Toronto Stock Exchange
TRI • Toronto Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Thomson Reuters Corp is 2.9× the market cap of Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc. TRI trades at a lower P/E than GFL. TRI offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric GFL TRI Current Price CA$53.28 CA$127.45 Daily Change -0.28% -0.08% 1-Year Return -20.53% -48.84% 52-Week High CA$71.13 CA$291.25 52-Week Low CA$53.23 CA$110.84 50-Day MA CA$58.50 CA$127.04 200-Day MA CA$62.45 CA$195.24 Beta 0.53 0.20
Size & Revenue Metric GFL TRI Market Cap $19.35B $56.45B Enterprise Value $27.26B $59.11B Revenue (TTM) $6.62B $7.48B Shares Outstanding 349.16M 443.85M Float 273.03M 130.04M Employees 14,850 27,100
Valuation Metric GFL TRI Trailing P/E 95.50 28.02 Forward P/E 42.92 20.62 PEG Ratio — 6.23 Price / Sales 2.92 7.55 Price / Book 2.64 3.46 EV / EBITDA 13.63 14.07
Profitability Metric GFL TRI Profit Margin 57.95% 20.09% Operating Margin (TTM) 6.37% 26.58% Return on Equity 3.28% 12.40% Return on Assets 1.23% 6.68% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.56 4.53
Growth Metric GFL TRI Revenue Growth (YoY) 7.30% 5.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) 22.20% -42.60%
Dividends Metric GFL TRI Dividend Yield 0.16% 1.96% Dividend / Share 0.08 2.38
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric GFL TRI Sortino (Composite) -1.35 -1.44 Sharpe (Composite) -1.05 2.15 Calmar (Composite) -1.65 -1.16 Hurst Exponent 0.5568 0.6283 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #25,663 #14,183
Ownership Metric GFL TRI % Insiders 296.60% 7045.20% % Institutions 10061.20% 2743.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.