CYATY vs ZIM: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited/ADR vs ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in United States.
CY
CYATY•United States
$22.46
-1.58%
ZI
ZIM•United States
$27.01
+0.22%
Quick Summary
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited/ADR is 127.7× the market cap of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. ZIM trades at a lower P/E than CYATY. ZIM offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $22.46 | $27.01 |
| Daily Change | -1.58% | 0.22% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 95.87% |
| 52-Week High | $22.82 | $29.27 |
| 52-Week Low | $11.31 | $12.44 |
| 50-Day MA | $20.45 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $20.45 | — |
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.45 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $399.26B | $3.13B |
| Enterprise Value | $242.03B | $7.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $423.70B | $6.90B |
| Shares Outstanding | 623.66M | 120.52M |
| Float | 2.44B | 114.76M |
| Employees | 185,839 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 37.07 | 6.52 |
| Forward P/E | 31.35 | -5.84 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.59 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.94 | 0.45 |
| Price / Book | 8.09 | 0.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.08 | 7.46 |
Profitability
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 17.04% | 6.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.06% | -2.02% |
| Return on Equity | 23.83% | 11.94% |
| Return on Assets | 5.40% | 4.75% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.59 | 3.98 |
Growth
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 36.60% | -31.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 50.10% | -93.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 755.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 1.99 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 9.64 | 8.93 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 4.13 | 3.86 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 24.37 | 15.08 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7338 | 0.6263 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,006 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CYATY | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| % Institutions | 5.80% | 56.72% |
Compare CYATY to peers
Compare ZIM to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.