CYATY vs SHKLY: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited/ADR vs Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in United States.
CY
CYATY•United States
$22.46
-1.58%
SH
SHKLY•United States
$146.57
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited/ADR is 41.9× the market cap of Sinotruk Hong Kong Ltd ADR. SHKLY trades at a lower P/E than CYATY. SHKLY offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $22.46 | $146.57 |
| Daily Change | -1.58% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 21.55% |
| 52-Week High | $22.82 | $149.05 |
| 52-Week Low | $11.31 | $121.39 |
| 50-Day MA | $20.45 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $20.45 | — |
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.47 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $399.26B | $9.52B |
| Enterprise Value | $242.03B | $375.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $423.70B | $97.12B |
| Shares Outstanding | 623.66M | 55.22M |
| Float | 2.44B | 719.63M |
| Employees | 185,839 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 37.07 | 9.55 |
| Forward P/E | 31.35 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 2.59 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.94 | 0.10 |
| Price / Book | 8.09 | 64.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.08 | 41.58 |
Profitability
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 17.04% | 6.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.06% | 8.07% |
| Return on Equity | 23.83% | 13.71% |
| Return on Assets | 5.40% | 3.33% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.59 | 15.35 |
Growth
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 36.60% | 4.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 50.10% | 4.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 564.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 8.27 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 9.64 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 4.13 | 1.41 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 24.37 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7338 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,006 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CYATY | SHKLY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | — |
| % Institutions | 5.80% | — |
Compare CYATY to peers
Compare SHKLY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.