CYATY vs SGGKF: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited/ADR vs Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in United States.
CY
CYATY•United States
$22.46
-1.58%
SG
SGGKF•United States
$8.67
-0.94%
Quick Summary
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited/ADR is 15.1× the market cap of Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd. CYATY trades at a lower P/E than SGGKF. SGGKF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $22.46 | $8.67 |
| Daily Change | -1.58% | -0.94% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 83.64% |
| 52-Week High | $22.82 | $9.32 |
| 52-Week Low | $11.31 | $5.62 |
| 50-Day MA | $20.45 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $20.45 | — |
| Beta | 0.48 | 0.24 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $399.26B | $26.52B |
| Enterprise Value | $242.03B | $29.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $423.70B | $12.35B |
| Shares Outstanding | 623.66M | 3.12B |
| Float | 2.44B | 1.51B |
| Employees | 185,839 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 37.07 | 71.27 |
| Forward P/E | 31.35 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 2.59 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.94 | 2.15 |
| Price / Book | 8.09 | 12.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.08 | 28.15 |
Profitability
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 17.04% | 3.75% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.06% | -0.96% |
| Return on Equity | 23.83% | 16.89% |
| Return on Assets | 5.40% | 1.94% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.59 | 0.11 |
Growth
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 36.60% | 11.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 50.10% | -83.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 242.00% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | 0.19 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 7.59 | -4.05 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 3.29 | -4.05 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 14.44 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.7338 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,003 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CYATY | SGGKF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| % Institutions | 5.80% | 68.11% |
Compare CYATY to peers
Compare SGGKF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.