CRMLY vs WRFRF: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR vs Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CR
CRMLY•United States
$10.52
+0.00%
WR
WRFRF•United States
$3.10
+0.00%
Quick Summary
China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR is 1.3× the market cap of Wharf Real Estate Investment Company Limited. WRFRF pays a dividend; CRMLY does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $10.52 | $3.10 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 38.20% |
| 52-Week High | $10.52 | $3.67 |
| 52-Week Low | $9.26 | $2.32 |
| 50-Day MA | $10.36 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $9.98 | — |
| Beta | 0.80 | 0.63 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.00B | $9.26B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.43B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.57B | $12.81B |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.14B | 3.04B |
| Float | 599.41M | 1.60B |
| Employees | 39,213 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 21.91 | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.52 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.68 | 0.72 |
| Price / Book | 5.30 | 0.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.02 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.46% | -33.22% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 29.76% | 72.80% |
| Return on Equity | 23.92% | -2.30% |
| Return on Assets | 9.79% | 2.50% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.48 | -0.18 |
Growth
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.50% | 0.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 7.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 554.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.17 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.78 | 0.30 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.68 | 6.85 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.64 | 0.46 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5271 | 0.4647 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #2,813 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CRMLY | WRFRF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 49.06% |
| % Institutions | 0.00% | 12.83% |
Compare CRMLY to peers
Compare WRFRF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.