CRMLY vs SUHJF: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR vs Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CR
CRMLY•United States
$10.52
+0.00%
SUHJF•United States
$18.36
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Sun Hung Kai Properties Limited is 4.9× the market cap of China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR. SUHJF trades at a lower P/E than CRMLY. SUHJF pays a dividend; CRMLY does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $10.52 | $18.36 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 110.31% |
| 52-Week High | $10.52 | $19.16 |
| 52-Week Low | $9.26 | $9.42 |
| 50-Day MA | $10.36 | $16.77 |
| 200-Day MA | $9.98 | $13.06 |
| Beta | 0.80 | 0.83 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.00B | $58.52B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.43B | $61.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.57B | $92.49B |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.14B | 2.90B |
| Float | 599.41M | 1.35B |
| Employees | 39,213 | 38,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 21.91 | 19.75 |
| Forward P/E | 18.52 | 16.50 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.06 |
| Price / Sales | 0.68 | 0.63 |
| Price / Book | 5.30 | 0.70 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.02 | 15.63 |
Profitability
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.46% | 23.79% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 29.76% | 24.34% |
| Return on Equity | 23.92% | 3.66% |
| Return on Assets | 9.79% | 2.08% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.48 | 0.97 |
Growth
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.50% | 32.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 7.40% | 36.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 19.73% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 3.78 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.78 | 5.96 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.68 | 1.88 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.64 | 15.34 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5271 | 0.5798 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #2,810 | #12,860 |
Ownership
| Metric | CRMLY | SUHJF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 5495.80% |
| % Institutions | 0.00% | 1471.20% |
Compare CRMLY to peers
Compare SUHJF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.