CRMLY vs SWPFF: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR vs Swire Properties Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CR
CRMLY•United States
$10.52
+0.00%
SW
SWPFF•United States
$3.14
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Swire Properties Limited is 1.4× the market cap of China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR. SWPFF pays a dividend; CRMLY does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $10.52 | $3.14 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | — | 56.75% |
| 52-Week High | $10.52 | $3.35 |
| 52-Week Low | $9.26 | $2.08 |
| 50-Day MA | $10.36 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $9.98 | — |
| Beta | 0.80 | 0.69 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.00B | $17.28B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.43B | $62.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.57B | $16.60B |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.14B | 5.76B |
| Float | 599.41M | 960.69M |
| Employees | 39,213 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 21.91 | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.52 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.68 | 1.04 |
| Price / Book | 5.30 | 0.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.02 | 6.92 |
Profitability
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.46% | -9.24% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 29.76% | 57.69% |
| Return on Equity | 23.92% | -0.56% |
| Return on Assets | 9.79% | 1.52% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.48 | -0.03 |
Growth
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.50% | 4.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 7.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 489.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.15 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.78 | 0.78 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.68 | 0.32 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 2.64 | -1.89 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5271 | 0.5795 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #2,813 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | CRMLY | SWPFF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.00% | 83.31% |
| % Institutions | 0.00% | 6.53% |
Compare CRMLY to peers
Compare SWPFF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.