CLILF vs CRMLY: CapitaLand Investment Limited vs China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
CL
CLILF•United States
$2.28
+0.00%
CR
CRMLY•United States
$10.52
+0.00%
Quick Summary
CapitaLand Investment Limited and China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Services Ltd. ADR are similar in size. CRMLY trades at a lower P/E than CLILF. CLILF pays a dividend; CRMLY does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $2.28 | $10.52 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 21.59% | — |
| 52-Week High | $2.71 | $10.52 |
| 52-Week Low | $1.54 | $9.26 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $10.36 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $9.98 |
| Beta | 0.57 | 0.80 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $11.92B | $12.00B |
| Enterprise Value | $19.18B | $11.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.13B | $17.57B |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.99B | 1.14B |
| Float | 2.29B | 599.41M |
| Employees | — | 39,213 |
Valuation
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 119.35 | 21.91 |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.52 |
| Price / Sales | 5.59 | 0.68 |
| Price / Book | 1.21 | 5.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.44 | 15.02 |
Profitability
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 6.80% | 21.46% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 27.45% | 29.76% |
| Return on Equity | 1.22% | 23.92% |
| Return on Assets | 1.48% | 9.79% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.02 | 0.48 |
Growth
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -24.60% | 6.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 7.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 385.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.09 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.34 | 1.78 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.14 | 0.68 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.77 | 2.64 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5166 | 0.5271 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #2,813 |
Ownership
| Metric | CLILF | CRMLY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 0.16% | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | 63.59% | 0.00% |
Compare CLILF to peers
Compare CRMLY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.