CLDHF vs ECMPA: CapitaLand China Trust vs Eurocommercial Properties N.V.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
CL
CLDHF•United States
$0.60
+0.00%
EC
ECMPA•Euronext Amsterdam
€28.60
+1.42%
Quick Summary
Eurocommercial Properties N.V. is 1.4× the market cap of CapitaLand China Trust. CLDHF trades at a lower P/E than ECMPA. CLDHF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $0.60 | €28.60 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 1.42% |
| 1-Year Return | 4.80% | 16.73% |
| 52-Week High | $0.63 | €28.60 |
| 52-Week Low | $0.50 | €24.65 |
| 50-Day MA | $0.60 | €26.53 |
| 200-Day MA | $0.59 | €26.38 |
| Beta | 0.72 | 0.82 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.07B | $1.54B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.03B | $3.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $303.72M | $284.00M |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.74B | 54.68M |
| Float | 1.30B | 54.34M |
| Employees | 0 | 100 |
Valuation
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 12.40 |
| Forward P/E | 4.31 | 11.01 |
| Price / Sales | 3.52 | 5.42 |
| Price / Book | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.76 | 11.54 |
Profitability
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -1.81% | 43.79% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 58.96% | 63.22% |
| Return on Equity | 0.25% | 5.86% |
| Return on Assets | 2.46% | 2.95% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.00 | 2.27 |
Growth
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -14.30% | 6.50% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 159.70% | -42.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 7.97% | 6.54% |
| Dividend / Share | 0.05 | 1.83 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.37 | 4.50 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.27 | 4.10 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.47 | 2.31 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4540 | 0.5843 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #16,780 | #12,086 |
Ownership
| Metric | CLDHF | ECMPA |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 98.50% | 2133.20% |
| % Institutions | 4242.30% | 3381.00% |
Compare CLDHF to peers
Compare ECMPA to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.