AMT vs CLDHF: American Tower Corp vs CapitaLand China Trust
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector. Both are listed in United States.
AMT•United States
$182.36
+2.11%
CL
CLDHF•United States
$0.60
+0.00%
Quick Summary
American Tower Corp is 79.0× the market cap of CapitaLand China Trust. CLDHF trades at a lower P/E than AMT. CLDHF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $182.36 | $0.60 |
| Daily Change | 2.11% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -18.10% | 4.80% |
| 52-Week High | $232.35 | $0.63 |
| 52-Week Low | $167.27 | $0.50 |
| 50-Day MA | $180.69 | $0.60 |
| 200-Day MA | $190.31 | $0.59 |
| Beta | 0.93 | 0.72 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $84.39B | $1.07B |
| Enterprise Value | $137.79B | $2.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.01B | $303.72M |
| Shares Outstanding | 466.37M | 1.74B |
| Float | 464.69M | 1.30B |
| Employees | 4,866 | 0 |
Valuation
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 33.57 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 27.70 | 4.31 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.98 | — |
| Price / Sales | 7.93 | 3.52 |
| Price / Book | 22.89 | 0.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.72 | 21.76 |
Profitability
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 23.76% | -1.81% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.94% | 58.96% |
| Return on Equity | 26.28% | 0.25% |
| Return on Assets | 4.90% | 2.46% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 5.39 | 0.00 |
Growth
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.50% | -14.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -33.20% | 159.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.79% | 7.97% |
| Dividend / Share | 6.80 | 0.05 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.81 | 0.37 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.47 | 0.27 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.99 | 0.47 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5831 | 0.4540 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | 6/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #17,176 | #16,780 |
Ownership
| Metric | AMT | CLDHF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 8.70% | 98.50% |
| % Institutions | 9599.70% | 4242.30% |
Compare AMT to peers
Compare CLDHF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.