CHKIF vs UAL: China Southern Airlines Company Limited vs United Airlines Holdings Inc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
CH
CHKIF•United States
$0.53
+0.80%
MX$1,797.91
+8.89%
Quick Summary
United Airlines Holdings Inc is 36.8× the market cap of China Southern Airlines Company Limited. CHKIF trades at a lower P/E than UAL.
Price & Performance
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $0.53 | MX$1,797.91 |
| Daily Change | 0.80% | 8.89% |
| 1-Year Return | 29.27% | 36.18% |
| 52-Week High | $0.79 | MX$2,080.00 |
| 52-Week Low | $0.35 | MX$1,290.00 |
| 50-Day MA | $0.74 | MX$1,757.52 |
| 200-Day MA | $0.59 | MX$1,823.77 |
| Beta | 0.33 | 1.29 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.36B | $527.98B |
| Enterprise Value | $42.90B | $871.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $177.23B | $59.07B |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.64B | 324.65M |
| Float | 5.43B | 320.60M |
| Employees | 102,597 | 113,200 |
Valuation
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | 9.21 |
| Forward P/E | 27.55 | 8.67 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.69 | 6.49 |
| Price / Sales | 0.08 | 8.94 |
| Price / Book | 1.88 | 2.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 60.93 | 5.99 |
Profitability
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -0.76% | 5.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.81% | 9.14% |
| Return on Equity | 0.83% | 23.99% |
| Return on Assets | 1.41% | 4.23% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.01 | 176.55 |
Growth
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.00% | 4.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -4.80% | 8.10% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.30 | 0.95 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.23 | 0.48 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.34 | 3.49 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6830 | 0.5671 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #20,399 |
Ownership
| Metric | CHKIF | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5703.80% | 62.90% |
| % Institutions | 1531.90% | 9053.40% |
Compare CHKIF to peers
Compare UAL to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.