BABWF vs CHKIF: International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. vs China Southern Airlines Company Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in United States.
BA
BABWF•United States
$5.23
+0.00%
CH
CHKIF•United States
$0.53
+0.80%
Quick Summary
International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. is 1.7× the market cap of China Southern Airlines Company Limited. CHKIF trades at a lower P/E than BABWF. BABWF pays a dividend; CHKIF does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $5.23 | $0.53 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.80% |
| 1-Year Return | 66.75% | 29.27% |
| 52-Week High | $6.00 | $0.79 |
| 52-Week Low | $3.50 | $0.35 |
| 50-Day MA | $5.65 | $0.74 |
| 200-Day MA | $5.17 | $0.59 |
| Beta | 1.30 | 0.33 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $23.74B | $14.36B |
| Enterprise Value | $28.44B | $42.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.21B | $177.23B |
| Shares Outstanding | 4.57B | 4.64B |
| Float | 1.65B | 5.43B |
| Employees | 54,620 | 102,597 |
Valuation
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 6.50 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 6.00 | 27.55 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.91 | 0.69 |
| Price / Sales | 0.71 | 0.08 |
| Price / Book | 2.71 | 1.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.11 | 60.93 |
Profitability
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 10.06% | -0.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.13% | 11.81% |
| Return on Equity | 48.54% | 0.83% |
| Return on Assets | 7.36% | 1.41% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.80 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.80% | 3.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 70.40% | -4.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.10 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.64 | -0.30 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.50 | -0.23 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.82 | -0.34 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4617 | 0.6830 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #4,188 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | BABWF | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2743.00% | 5703.80% |
| % Institutions | 2629.90% | 1531.90% |
Compare BABWF to peers
Compare CHKIF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.