ASPL vs GTWCF: Aseana Properties Limited vs Greentown China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
AS
ASPL•London Stock Exchange
$0.07
+0.00%
$2.17B
GT
GTWCF•United States
$1.45
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Greentown China Holdings Limited is 1.7× the market cap of Aseana Properties Limited. GTWCF pays a dividend; ASPL does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | $0.07 | $1.45 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -15.15% | — |
| 52-Week High | $0.09 | $1.45 |
| 52-Week Low | $0.07 | $1.45 |
| 50-Day MA | $0.07 | — |
| 200-Day MA | $0.08 | — |
| Beta | 0.48 | 0.67 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.17B | $3.68B |
| Enterprise Value | $30.31M | $168.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.58M | $142.35B |
| Shares Outstanding | 289.65M | 2.54B |
| Float | 72.00M | 1.02B |
| Employees | 242 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.60 | 0.03 |
| Price / Book | 0.44 | 0.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.00 | 16.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -21.02% | -0.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -37.68% | 8.55% |
| Return on Equity | -6.19% | 1.79% |
| Return on Assets | -4.77% | 1.16% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.02 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 159.90% | -23.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 0.00% | -89.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 288.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.04 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.16 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -1.05 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.49 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5432 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | ASPL | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6161.90% | 59.96% |
| % Institutions | 2090.90% | 10.70% |
Compare ASPL to peers
Compare GTWCF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.