Home ASPL vs FRSHY ASPL vs FRSHY: Aseana Properties Limited vs China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd ADR Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
AS
ASPL • London Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Aseana Properties Limited and China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd ADR are similar in size. ASPL trades at a lower P/E than FRSHY. FRSHY pays a dividend; ASPL does not.
Price & Performance Metric ASPL FRSHY Current Price $0.07 $7.50 Daily Change 0.00% 0.00% 1-Year Return -15.15% 80.51% 52-Week High $0.09 $7.50 52-Week Low $0.07 $4.16 50-Day MA $0.07 $7.50 200-Day MA $0.08 $7.50 Beta 0.48 0.70
Size & Revenue Metric ASPL FRSHY Market Cap $2.17B $2.03B Enterprise Value $30.31M $15.63B Revenue (TTM) $13.58M $62.19B Shares Outstanding 289.65M 270.25M Float 72.00M 6.52B Employees 242 8,384
Valuation Metric ASPL FRSHY Trailing P/E 0.00 20.83 Forward P/E 0.00 4.89 PEG Ratio 0.00 0.12 Price / Sales 1.60 0.03 Price / Book 0.44 0.27 EV / EBITDA 0.00 14.39
Profitability Metric ASPL FRSHY Profit Margin -21.02% 1.84% Operating Margin (TTM) -37.68% 6.66% Return on Equity -6.19% 1.38% Return on Assets -4.77% 0.58% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.02 0.36
Growth Metric ASPL FRSHY Revenue Growth (YoY) 159.90% 14.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) 0.00% -22.30%
Dividends Metric ASPL FRSHY Dividend Yield — 0.37% Dividend / Share — 0.03
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric ASPL FRSHY Sortino (Composite) -1.16 — Sharpe (Composite) -1.05 1.02 Calmar (Composite) -1.49 — Hurst Exponent 0.5432 0.5394 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank — #15,216
Ownership Metric ASPL FRSHY % Insiders 6161.90% 0.00% % Institutions 2090.90% 0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.