AFR0 vs CHKIF: AIR FRANCE-KLM INH. EO 1 vs China Southern Airlines Company Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
AF
AFR0•XETRA (Frankfurt)
€10.60
+7.85%
CH
CHKIF•United States
$0.53
+0.80%
Quick Summary
China Southern Airlines Company Limited is 5.1× the market cap of AIR FRANCE-KLM INH. EO 1. CHKIF trades at a lower P/E than AFR0.
Price & Performance
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | €10.60 | $0.53 |
| Daily Change | 7.85% | 0.80% |
| 1-Year Return | 42.10% | 29.27% |
| 52-Week High | €14.91 | $0.79 |
| 52-Week Low | €7.38 | $0.35 |
| 50-Day MA | €10.43 | $0.74 |
| 200-Day MA | €11.35 | $0.59 |
| Beta | 1.29 | 0.33 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.80B | $14.36B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.14B | $42.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.01B | $177.23B |
| Shares Outstanding | 262.66M | 4.64B |
| Float | 114.38M | 5.43B |
| Employees | 84,042 | 102,597 |
Valuation
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 1.75 | 0.00 |
| Forward P/E | 2.88 | 27.55 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.14 | 0.69 |
| Price / Sales | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Price / Book | 9.34 | 1.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 0.57 | 60.93 |
Profitability
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 4.83% | -0.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.06% | 11.81% |
| Return on Equity | 110.91% | 0.83% |
| Return on Assets | 3.44% | 1.41% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 6.06 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.90% | 3.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 0.00% | -4.80% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 2.08 | -0.30 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.90 | -0.23 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.87 | -0.34 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5753 | 0.6830 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,791 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | AFR0 | CHKIF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5436.10% | 5703.80% |
| % Institutions | 1733.60% | 1531.90% |
Compare AFR0 to peers
Compare CHKIF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.