Home 6198 vs CICOF 6198 vs CICOF: Qingdao Port International Co Ltd vs COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co. Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
61
6198 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary Qingdao Port International Co Ltd is 1.9× the market cap of COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co. Ltd. CICOF trades at a lower P/E than 6198. CICOF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 6198 CICOF Current Price HK$7.67 $1.95 Daily Change 0.00% 0.52% 1-Year Return 31.34% 34.85% 52-Week High HK$7.69 $2.05 52-Week Low HK$5.57 $1.38 50-Day MA HK$7.26 — 200-Day MA HK$7.10 — Beta 0.49 0.74
Size & Revenue Metric 6198 CICOF Market Cap $62.12B $31.86B Enterprise Value $49.69B $5.76B Revenue (TTM) $18.81B $219.50B Shares Outstanding 1.10B 2.75B Float 1.37B 7.15B Employees 9,552 —
Valuation Metric 6198 CICOF Trailing P/E 8.02 6.69 Forward P/E 0.00 -194.00 Price / Sales 3.30 0.15 Price / Book 0.93 0.89 EV / EBITDA 5.97 0.13
Profitability Metric 6198 CICOF Profit Margin 28.03% 14.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 24.63% 7.82% Return on Equity 11.81% 12.39% Return on Assets 5.19% 4.32% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.85 0.29
Growth Metric 6198 CICOF Revenue Growth (YoY) -7.90% -12.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -15.30% -65.40%
Dividends Metric 6198 CICOF Dividend Yield 4.58% 1144.00% Dividend / Share 0.34 0.22
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 6198 CICOF Sortino (Composite) 3.73 1.80 Sharpe (Composite) 1.97 0.88 Calmar (Composite) 10.61 2.93 Hurst Exponent 0.5722 0.4442 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 — Magic Formula Rank #6,984 —
Ownership Metric 6198 CICOF % Insiders 2669.70% 13.79% % Institutions 3693.20% 28.84%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.