Home 1919 vs 6198 1919 vs 6198: COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H vs Qingdao Port International Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in Hong Kong.
1919 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
61
6198 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd H is 4.2× the market cap of Qingdao Port International Co Ltd. 1919 trades at a lower P/E than 6198. 1919 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 1919 6198 Current Price HK$14.70 HK$7.67 Daily Change -1.54% 0.00% 1-Year Return 30.55% 31.34% 52-Week High HK$16.29 HK$7.69 52-Week Low HK$11.16 HK$5.57 50-Day MA HK$15.01 HK$7.26 200-Day MA HK$14.02 HK$7.10 Beta 0.74 0.49
Size & Revenue Metric 1919 6198 Market Cap $259.60B $62.12B Enterprise Value $174.78B $49.69B Revenue (TTM) $219.50B $18.81B Shares Outstanding 2.75B 1.10B Float 7.15B 1.37B Employees 32,768 9,552
Valuation Metric 1919 6198 Trailing P/E 6.70 8.02 Forward P/E 6.74 0.00 PEG Ratio 3.66 — Price / Sales 1.18 3.30 Price / Book 0.88 0.93 EV / EBITDA 3.39 5.97
Profitability Metric 1919 6198 Profit Margin 14.06% 28.03% Operating Margin (TTM) 7.82% 24.63% Return on Equity 12.39% 11.81% Return on Assets 4.32% 5.19% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.71 0.85
Growth Metric 1919 6198 Revenue Growth (YoY) -12.20% -7.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) -64.60% -15.30%
Dividends Metric 1919 6198 Dividend Yield 6.52% 4.58% Dividend / Share 1.00 0.34
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 1919 6198 Sortino (Composite) 1.31 3.73 Sharpe (Composite) 0.46 1.97 Calmar (Composite) 0.18 10.61 Hurst Exponent 0.6722 0.5722 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #9,241 #6,984
Ownership Metric 1919 6198 % Insiders 1378.60% 2669.70% % Institutions 2915.00% 3693.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.