Sign up for free insights newsletter

601919 vs 900920: COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd vs Shanghai Diesel Engine Co Ltd B

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥14.72
-1.34%
China
$225.40B
$0.39
+0.00%
China
$1.67B

Quick Summary

COSCO SHIPPING Holdings Co Ltd is 135.3× the market cap of Shanghai Diesel Engine Co Ltd B. 601919 pays a dividend; 900920 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric601919900920
Current PriceCN¥14.72$0.39
Daily Change-1.34%0.00%
1-Year Return3.52%93.97%
52-Week HighCN¥16.97$0.40
52-Week LowCN¥14.15$0.18
50-Day MACN¥15.17
200-Day MACN¥15.09
Beta0.740.75

Size & Revenue

Metric601919900920
Market Cap$225.40B$1.67B
Enterprise Value$148.41B$-433.23M
Revenue (TTM)$219.50B$5.40B
Shares Outstanding12.56B344.80M
Float7.15B625.55M
Employees32,768

Valuation

Metric601919900920
Trailing P/E7.43
Forward P/E8.52
PEG Ratio0.26
Price / Sales1.030.31
Price / Book0.981.02
EV / EBITDA3.300.68

Profitability

Metric601919900920
Profit Margin14.06%-20.09%
Operating Margin (TTM)7.82%-3.05%
Return on Equity12.39%-29.26%
Return on Assets4.32%-3.83%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.98-0.11

Growth

Metric601919900920
Revenue Growth (YoY)-12.20%-11.90%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-64.60%

Dividends

Metric601919900920
Dividend Yield6.70%
Dividend / Share1.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601919900920
Sortino (Composite)-0.698.84
Sharpe (Composite)-0.764.05
Calmar (Composite)-2.677.21
Hurst Exponent0.62730.6232
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#8,776

Ownership

Metric601919900920
% Insiders6106.30%0.00%
% Institutions829.40%0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.