Home 601868 vs SQU 601868 vs SQU: China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd vs Vinci S. A. Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd is 1.6× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 601868 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. SQU offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601868 SQU Current Price CN¥2.91 €137.55 Daily Change 1.04% 2.27% 1-Year Return 28.19% 14.86% 52-Week High CN¥3.74 €142.20 52-Week Low CN¥2.20 €113.20 50-Day MA CN¥2.83 €132.06 200-Day MA CN¥2.54 €123.05 Beta 0.54 0.79
Size & Revenue Metric 601868 SQU Market Cap $120.90B $75.15B Enterprise Value $314.63B $94.15B Revenue (TTM) $452.93B $75.70B Shares Outstanding 32.43B 553.46M Float 19.53B 477.54M Employees 116,055 292,101
Valuation Metric 601868 SQU Trailing P/E 15.26 15.69 Forward P/E 0.00 14.79 PEG Ratio — 2.74 Price / Sales 0.27 0.99 Price / Book 1.01 2.44 EV / EBITDA 13.32 6.90
Profitability Metric 601868 SQU Profit Margin 1.29% 6.48% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.42% 13.14% Return on Equity 4.70% 15.43% Return on Assets 1.37% 4.32% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.19 8.65
Growth Metric 601868 SQU Revenue Growth (YoY) -8.60% 5.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -47.60% 6.80%
Dividends Metric 601868 SQU Dividend Yield 1.08% 3.66% Dividend / Share 0.03 5.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601868 SQU Sortino (Composite) 1.82 6.26 Sharpe (Composite) 0.87 2.57 Calmar (Composite) 6.12 2.43 Hurst Exponent 0.5938 0.5565 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,575 #9,038
Ownership Metric 601868 SQU % Insiders 5310.50% 1210.50% % Institutions 1099.30% 5062.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.