Sign up for free insights newsletter

601868 vs FGR: China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd vs Eiffage SA

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥2.91
+1.04%
China
$120.90B
FG
FGREuronext Paris
€142.70
+1.71%
France
$13.62B

Quick Summary

China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd is 8.9× the market cap of Eiffage SA. FGR trades at a lower P/E than 601868. FGR offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601868FGR
Current PriceCN¥2.91€142.70
Daily Change1.04%1.71%
1-Year Return28.19%25.67%
52-Week HighCN¥3.74€146.35
52-Week LowCN¥2.20€104.40
50-Day MACN¥2.83€135.97
200-Day MACN¥2.54€120.86
Beta0.540.76

Size & Revenue

Metric601868FGR
Market Cap$120.90B$13.62B
Enterprise Value$314.63B$23.45B
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$26.12B
Shares Outstanding32.43B96.25M
Float19.53B72.92M
Employees116,05587,000

Valuation

Metric601868FGR
Trailing P/E15.2613.22
Forward P/E0.0012.33
PEG Ratio2.13
Price / Sales0.270.52
Price / Book1.011.82
EV / EBITDA13.325.46

Profitability

Metric601868FGR
Profit Margin1.29%3.91%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%11.59%
Return on Equity4.70%17.30%
Return on Assets1.37%3.98%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.1910.70

Growth

Metric601868FGR
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%9.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%7.00%

Dividends

Metric601868FGR
Dividend Yield1.08%3.36%
Dividend / Share0.034.80

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601868FGR
Sortino (Composite)1.825.84
Sharpe (Composite)0.872.71
Calmar (Composite)6.1211.26
Hurst Exponent0.59380.6469
Piotroski F-Score5/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#18,575#8,852

Ownership

Metric601868FGR
% Insiders5310.50%2015.50%
% Institutions1099.30%4247.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.