Sign up for free insights newsletter

601868 vs EN: China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd vs Bouygues SA

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥2.91
+1.04%
China
$120.90B
Bouygues SA
ENEuronext Paris
€52.42
-0.19%
France
$20.23B

Quick Summary

China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd is 6.0× the market cap of Bouygues SA. 601868 trades at a lower P/E than EN. EN offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601868EN
Current PriceCN¥2.91€52.42
Daily Change1.04%-0.19%
1-Year Return28.19%40.39%
52-Week HighCN¥3.74€52.94
52-Week LowCN¥2.20€35.63
50-Day MACN¥2.83€49.92
200-Day MACN¥2.54€42.87
Beta0.540.71

Size & Revenue

Metric601868EN
Market Cap$120.90B$20.23B
Enterprise Value$314.63B$27.86B
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$56.88B
Shares Outstanding32.43B384.97M
Float19.53B215.76M
Employees116,055196,184

Valuation

Metric601868EN
Trailing P/E15.2617.57
Forward P/E0.0015.97
PEG Ratio2.22
Price / Sales0.270.36
Price / Book1.011.55
EV / EBITDA13.324.84

Profitability

Metric601868EN
Profit Margin1.29%2.00%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%4.01%
Return on Equity4.70%8.66%
Return on Assets1.37%2.22%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.192.99

Growth

Metric601868EN
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%-1.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%22.10%

Dividends

Metric601868EN
Dividend Yield1.08%3.97%
Dividend / Share0.032.10

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601868EN
Sortino (Composite)1.824.66
Sharpe (Composite)0.872.49
Calmar (Composite)6.1211.26
Hurst Exponent0.59380.5823
Piotroski F-Score5/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#18,575#13,884

Ownership

Metric601868EN
% Insiders5310.50%4334.10%
% Institutions1099.30%2242.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.