Home 601868 vs EFGSF 601868 vs EFGSF: China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd vs Eiffage SA Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary China Energy Engineering Corp Ltd is 7.8× the market cap of Eiffage SA. EFGSF trades at a lower P/E than 601868. EFGSF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601868 EFGSF Current Price CN¥2.91 $152.26 Daily Change 1.04% 0.00% 1-Year Return 28.19% 34.61% 52-Week High CN¥3.74 $157.38 52-Week Low CN¥2.20 $129.11 50-Day MA CN¥2.83 $141.08 200-Day MA CN¥2.54 $136.34 Beta 0.54 0.73
Size & Revenue Metric 601868 EFGSF Market Cap $120.90B $15.58B Enterprise Value $314.63B $26.19B Revenue (TTM) $452.93B $26.12B Shares Outstanding 32.43B 96.25M Float 19.53B 73.53M Employees 116,055 84,400
Valuation Metric 601868 EFGSF Trailing P/E 15.26 12.39 Forward P/E 0.00 11.60 PEG Ratio — 2.00 Price / Sales 0.27 0.60 Price / Book 1.01 1.75 EV / EBITDA 13.32 5.29
Profitability Metric 601868 EFGSF Profit Margin 1.29% 3.91% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.42% 11.32% Return on Equity 4.70% 17.22% Return on Assets 1.37% 3.92% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.19 12.70
Growth Metric 601868 EFGSF Revenue Growth (YoY) -8.60% 9.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -47.60% 11.60%
Dividends Metric 601868 EFGSF Dividend Yield 1.08% 3.05% Dividend / Share 0.03 4.80
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601868 EFGSF Sortino (Composite) 1.82 4.41 Sharpe (Composite) 0.87 1.56 Calmar (Composite) 6.12 13.25 Hurst Exponent 0.5938 0.5719 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,575 #9,618
Ownership Metric 601868 EFGSF % Insiders 5310.50% 2015.50% % Institutions 1099.30% 4217.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.