Sign up for free insights newsletter

601669 vs STBBF: Power Construction Corp of China Ltd vs Strabag SE

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥5.71
-0.17%
China
$98.36B
ST
STBBFUnited States
$105.50
+0.00%
United States
$13.18B

Quick Summary

Power Construction Corp of China Ltd is 7.5× the market cap of Strabag SE. 601669 trades at a lower P/E than STBBF. STBBF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601669STBBF
Current PriceCN¥5.71$105.50
Daily Change-0.17%0.00%
1-Year Return19.71%43.73%
52-Week HighCN¥7.45$111.23
52-Week LowCN¥4.69$73.40
50-Day MACN¥5.78$102.86
200-Day MACN¥5.73$94.54
Beta0.200.38

Size & Revenue

Metric601669STBBF
Market Cap$98.36B$13.18B
Enterprise Value$546.97B$8.64B
Revenue (TTM)$646.71B$17.92B
Shares Outstanding17.23B115.44M
Float8.09B21.24M
Employees163,91279,159

Valuation

Metric601669STBBF
Trailing P/E10.2013.15
Forward P/E0.000.00
Price / Sales0.150.74
Price / Book0.582.32
EV / EBITDA16.574.07

Profitability

Metric601669STBBF
Profit Margin1.66%4.61%
Operating Margin (TTM)3.62%-1.66%
Return on Equity5.16%18.39%
Return on Assets1.37%3.17%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.568.46

Growth

Metric601669STBBF
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.80%6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-17.90%-2.20%

Dividends

Metric601669STBBF
Dividend Yield2.22%2.25%
Dividend / Share0.132.50

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601669STBBF
Sortino (Composite)1.151.75
Sharpe (Composite)0.351.60
Calmar (Composite)-0.212.82
Hurst Exponent0.68370.5181
Piotroski F-Score5/98/9
Magic Formula Rank#22,387#9,795

Ownership

Metric601669STBBF
% Insiders5368.70%6606.00%
% Institutions1069.90%2042.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.