Home 601618 vs STBBF 601618 vs STBBF: Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd vs Strabag SE Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd is 4.7× the market cap of Strabag SE. 601618 trades at a lower P/E than STBBF. STBBF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601618 STBBF Current Price CN¥2.98 $105.50 Daily Change -0.33% 0.00% 1-Year Return 0.68% 43.73% 52-Week High CN¥4.14 $111.23 52-Week Low CN¥2.88 $73.40 50-Day MA CN¥3.07 $102.86 200-Day MA CN¥3.24 $94.54 Beta 1.09 0.38
Size & Revenue Metric 601618 STBBF Market Cap $61.76B $13.18B Enterprise Value $64.72B $8.64B Revenue (TTM) $434.76B $17.92B Shares Outstanding 17.85B 115.44M Float 9.27B 21.24M Employees 89,982 79,159
Valuation Metric 601618 STBBF Trailing P/E 0.00 13.15 Forward P/E 6.64 0.00 Price / Sales 0.14 0.74 Price / Book 0.40 2.32 EV / EBITDA 4.89 4.07
Profitability Metric 601618 STBBF Profit Margin 0.30% 4.61% Operating Margin (TTM) -3.24% -1.66% Return on Equity 4.22% 18.39% Return on Assets 0.96% 3.17% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.00 8.46
Growth Metric 601618 STBBF Revenue Growth (YoY) -13.70% 6.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -59.10% -2.20%
Dividends Metric 601618 STBBF Dividend Yield 0.00% 2.25% Dividend / Share 0.00 2.50
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601618 STBBF Sortino (Composite) -0.62 1.75 Sharpe (Composite) -0.49 1.60 Calmar (Composite) -1.33 2.82 Hurst Exponent 0.5520 0.5181 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 8/9 Magic Formula Rank #10,487 #9,795
Ownership Metric 601618 STBBF % Insiders 6396.20% 6606.00% % Institutions 646.20% 2042.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.