Home 601598 vs QUB 601598 vs QUB: Sinotrans Ltd Class A vs QUBE Holdings Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
QU
QUB • Australian Securities Exchange
Quick Summary Sinotrans Ltd Class A is 4.9× the market cap of QUBE Holdings Ltd. 601598 trades at a lower P/E than QUB. 601598 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601598 QUB Current Price CN¥6.06 A$5.01 Daily Change -0.33% 0.20% 1-Year Return 24.69% 29.12% 52-Week High CN¥7.80 A$5.06 52-Week Low CN¥4.69 A$3.79 50-Day MA CN¥5.96 A$4.93 200-Day MA CN¥6.03 A$4.55 Beta 1.20 0.64
Size & Revenue Metric 601598 QUB Market Cap $43.47B $8.85B Enterprise Value $41.28B $11.75B Revenue (TTM) $96.81B $4.37B Shares Outstanding 5.16B 1.77B Float 2.76B 1.74B Employees 31,953 10,000
Valuation Metric 601598 QUB Trailing P/E 11.22 41.67 Forward P/E 0.00 27.25 PEG Ratio — 6.50 Price / Sales 0.45 2.03 Price / Book 1.10 2.82 EV / EBITDA 7.52 14.38
Profitability Metric 601598 QUB Profit Margin 4.15% 3.62% Operating Margin (TTM) -0.73% 9.88% Return on Equity 9.95% 6.99% Return on Assets 1.56% 2.69% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.54 0.12
Growth Metric 601598 QUB Revenue Growth (YoY) 10.20% 10.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) 29.80% 100.70%
Dividends Metric 601598 QUB Dividend Yield 4.93% 2.23% Dividend / Share 0.30 0.11
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601598 QUB Sortino (Composite) 0.71 3.51 Sharpe (Composite) 0.39 1.63 Calmar (Composite) -0.05 5.16 Hurst Exponent 0.5267 0.6472 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #9,411 #25,464
Ownership Metric 601598 QUB % Insiders 8071.90% 730.10% % Institutions 658.30% 5948.90%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.