Home 300274 vs 601598 300274 vs 601598: Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd vs Sinotrans Ltd Class A Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.
Quick Summary Sungrow Power Supply Co Ltd is 6.3× the market cap of Sinotrans Ltd Class A. 601598 trades at a lower P/E than 300274. 601598 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 300274 601598 Current Price CN¥132.75 CN¥6.06 Daily Change -0.86% -0.33% 1-Year Return 136.76% 24.69% 52-Week High CN¥205.40 CN¥7.80 52-Week Low CN¥56.24 CN¥4.69 50-Day MA CN¥150.76 CN¥5.96 200-Day MA CN¥145.43 CN¥6.03 Beta 0.47 1.20
Size & Revenue Metric 300274 601598 Market Cap $274.35B $43.47B Enterprise Value $250.14B $41.28B Revenue (TTM) $89.18B $96.81B Shares Outstanding 2.07B 5.16B Float 1.36B 2.76B Employees 19,006 31,953
Valuation Metric 300274 601598 Trailing P/E 20.26 11.22 Forward P/E 20.79 0.00 PEG Ratio 5.78 — Price / Sales 3.08 0.45 Price / Book 5.96 1.10 EV / EBITDA 14.08 7.52
Profitability Metric 300274 601598 Profit Margin 15.09% 4.15% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.85% -0.73% Return on Equity 30.08% 9.95% Return on Assets 8.44% 1.56% Diluted EPS (TTM) 6.53 0.54
Growth Metric 300274 601598 Revenue Growth (YoY) -18.40% 10.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -52.70% 29.80%
Dividends Metric 300274 601598 Dividend Yield 1.22% 4.93% Dividend / Share 1.64 0.30
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 300274 601598 Sortino (Composite) 0.62 0.71 Sharpe (Composite) 0.21 0.39 Calmar (Composite) -0.46 -0.05 Hurst Exponent 0.6306 0.5267 Piotroski F-Score 9/9 5/9 Magic Formula Rank #6,655 #9,411
Ownership Metric 300274 601598 % Insiders 3224.10% 8071.90% % Institutions 1824.70% 658.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.